CGTalk > Challenges > FXWARS Challenge
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-26-2012, 06:44 AM   #1
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
FXWARS Challenge:36 -Seven Towers - JamesNZ

For this challenge I think I'll go either for the tower of Anemoi, which is in a canyon, or the tower of Phaunos, which is in a temperate forest.
I'm leaning towards Phaunos since there's miles of bush/forest nearby which will give me a good reference. I could also create a high-res pano of the forest and use that as a background to composite the tower into.

Got me some thinkin' to do
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Old 09-30-2012, 02:09 AM   #2
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
I've decided to go for the tower of Anemoi, which is in a canyon.

So this is my plan so far:
1. Get a high-res background of a canyon
2. Texture/light/render a canyon model (likely tower 4) in Blender, using Cycles.
3. Composite the model into the BG with Nuke, I'll also add some camera movement.

I found a suitable 2K photo, so I've done some touch ups to make it ready for compositing.

Next up, pre-vis!

EDIT: A (very) WIP texture rendering:



The stones are far too low-res :( You can also see a tiling pattern.
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus

Last edited by JamesNZ : 10-01-2012 at 06:25 AM.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 12:51 AM   #3
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
I decided to go with Tower 3, the composition is better than with tower 4 relative to the background I'm going to use. So I've been setting up materials and fixing up the geometry for a couple of days, it's a lot harder than I thought

Here's a quick render showing where I am as far as materials go:


Obviously I won't be using those colors The colors just show which parts of the tower will be using the same materials based on geometric similarities, e.g, the blue areas will be using the same materials because they have similar geometry. Now to start the actual texturing
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Old 10-05-2012, 08:15 AM   #4
pingking
Expert
portfolio
michael vorberg
digital compositor
freelance
stuttgart, Germany
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 634
because of your backplate it looks like a miniture. maybe 1-1.5m tall. this comes from the stones on the ground, you know how big these stones are in real life and then you brain does the work on the size of the tower
 
Old 10-05-2012, 10:20 AM   #5
manja
Veteran
portfolio
manja manja
paris, FR
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 78
actually, there's no rule about the size the tower mus be. i agree with you but that also could be fun to create a tiny tower!
__________________
https://vimeo.com/vfxmanja
 
Old 10-06-2012, 01:24 AM   #6
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
Actually that's the HDRI I'm using for lighting, the actual backplate is quite different

This week I'll be working on texturing/UV unwrapping the tower. Fun.
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Old 10-08-2012, 03:02 AM   #7
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
Ok, making (very) slow progress on the texturing. The model is going high-poly pretty quickly, even with most of the details coming from displacement. Here's a 70-ish% done render of the spikes:

Biggest thing that stands out to me is the lack of a decent spec map. Need to get me some painting experience

C&C very welcome

EDIT: And I think I'll call it done about here:
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus

Last edited by JamesNZ : 10-08-2012 at 06:02 AM.
 
Old 10-08-2012, 05:11 PM   #8
WyattHarris
Daddy x 4
 
WyattHarris's Avatar
CGSociety Member
portfolio
Wyatt Harris
WyattHarris.com
Baton Rouge, USA
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,746
Hmm, what are you calling done, the texturing?
__________________
HMC: Model Collection
WIP: Harris Nut House
WIP: WarCraft Troll
wyattharris.com Dig it!
 
Old 10-09-2012, 03:09 AM   #9
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyattHarris
Hmm, what are you calling done, the texturing?


For the spikes, yes. Please be harsh, I'm not very good at texturing
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Old 10-10-2012, 10:44 PM   #10
nickmarshallvfx
Expert
 
nickmarshallvfx's Avatar
portfolio
Nick Marshall
Lead Environment Artist / Matte Painter
Double Negative
Central London, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,151
Send a message via MSN to nickmarshallvfx
I think it would be worth revisiting your textures. It looks like your displacement is kicking out some pretty crazy spikes, and the surface itself is kind of hard to figure out the material. What are you using as reference for these? I think for a huge structure you should have a much smoother finish to the stone. Remember, this has been built by someone and the structure would have to have been carefully constructed probably by mining for good quality stone. Almost any example you can find of large stone structures have been quite carefully shaped and carved, just take a look at the Egyptian obelisks or something like Puma Punku. These were constructed thousands of years ago but still they had the ability to carefully shape their materials even using primitive tools.
Its hard to find a ref for anything like what you are building but take a look at this image:

http://www.travel-images.com/pht/jordan209.jpg

You can see the precision in the building and also get an idea of how it was constructed as you can see the bricks. You can still go for a single huge stone but take weathering into account. There is no way that a structure this large could stay this sharp if it was exposed to the elements. Take a look at how smooth the stones are at stone henge. Also try and work with your material to add a bit of variety to the finish. Some areas might be a little more rough, some a little smoother and more glossy, but try and stop it being just a single course texture.

Sorry for the long reply, and i hope it didnt come across too critical!
Good luck!

N

Last edited by nickmarshallvfx : 10-10-2012 at 10:46 PM.
 
Old 10-10-2012, 11:28 PM   #11
manja
Veteran
portfolio
manja manja
paris, FR
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 78
well there's actually one case where this one could work. if the tower is like 10 000 years old, it would have been attacked by the weather and we probably couldn't see any distinct piece of stones.
or if the tower has been carved in one huge rock.
__________________
https://vimeo.com/vfxmanja
 
Old 10-11-2012, 12:56 AM   #12
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickmarshallvfx
I think it would be worth revisiting your textures. It looks like your displacement is kicking out some pretty crazy spikes, and the surface itself is kind of hard to figure out the material. What are you using as reference for these? I think for a huge structure you should have a much smoother finish to the stone. Remember, this has been built by someone and the structure would have to have been carefully constructed probably by mining for good quality stone. Almost any example you can find of large stone structures have been quite carefully shaped and carved, just take a look at the Egyptian obelisks or something like Puma Punku. These were constructed thousands of years ago but still they had the ability to carefully shape their materials even using primitive tools.
Its hard to find a ref for anything like what you are building but take a look at this image:

http://www.travel-images.com/pht/jordan209.jpg

You can see the precision in the building and also get an idea of how it was constructed as you can see the bricks. You can still go for a single huge stone but take weathering into account. There is no way that a structure this large could stay this sharp if it was exposed to the elements. Take a look at how smooth the stones are at stone henge. Also try and work with your material to add a bit of variety to the finish. Some areas might be a little more rough, some a little smoother and more glossy, but try and stop it being just a single course texture.

Sorry for the long reply, and i hope it didnt come across too critical!
Good luck!

N


Great advice! Thanks Nick I definitely agree with you about the textures, I'll try painting some maps for them this afternoon. Problem is that I'll have to do it in the gimp, since the polycount of the models makes interactive painting in Blender ridiculous Though I could do it with procedural textures...

I think the spikes are coming from my bump mapping actually, not the displacement. Below is a screenshot showing the displaced model:

This is one of my references: http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthr...hlight=tower%5C. I'm aiming for that kind of overgrown, abandoned, mossy, look; but without the bricks, so the different parts of the tower appear to be carved from big slabs of rock then assembled together.

@manja, yeah that's pretty much the look I'm going for.
Here's another quick test render:

It's looking quite ugly :( Definitely going to have to redo the UV's.

Thanks for the comments guys, they're really helpful
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Old 10-11-2012, 05:14 PM   #13
WyattHarris
Daddy x 4
 
WyattHarris's Avatar
CGSociety Member
portfolio
Wyatt Harris
WyattHarris.com
Baton Rouge, USA
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,746
This looks like a better direction. Previously I was trying to place what it reminded me of and all I could think of was the worn down metal of sunken ships.

On top of your small details (pit marks etc.) I'd model in some big items. Large cracks or missing pieces of stone.
__________________
HMC: Model Collection
WIP: Harris Nut House
WIP: WarCraft Troll
wyattharris.com Dig it!
 
Old 10-11-2012, 11:51 PM   #14
nickmarshallvfx
Expert
 
nickmarshallvfx's Avatar
portfolio
Nick Marshall
Lead Environment Artist / Matte Painter
Double Negative
Central London, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,151
Send a message via MSN to nickmarshallvfx
I agree, this does look like a better result. I also agree about getting some nice cracks etc into the stone to add interest and make them unique. I still think something so large that has been carved out would have a smoother finish, but if this isn't what you are going for then i guess thats your call. Id love to see a smoother finish and some details carved in like design or construction marks or maybe some runes or hyrogliphs or something?
Either way, your results are impoving with each render so keep it up, look forward to seeing where you take it.

N
 
Old 10-12-2012, 01:11 AM   #15
JamesNZ
Frequenter
portfolio
James W
Wellington, New Zealand
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyattHarris
On top of your small details (pit marks etc.) I'd model in some big items. Large cracks or missing pieces of stone.


Great idea, I'll check it out

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickmarshallvfx
Id love to see a smoother finish and some details carved in like design or construction marks or maybe some runes or hyrogliphs or something?


Hmmmm, now that's an interesting direction....
__________________
"For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul?"

- Jesus
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.