View Full Version : After affetcs vs. Combustion

04 April 2003, 07:55 PM
which one do u like best to work with?? Please reply if u got something to say... No flamewars!!


04 April 2003, 08:18 PM
Depends on the job. For a motion graphics piece with 100 layers, AE. The Keyframe assistant is a godsend for this type of work.

For anything involving 3d layers though, c2. It's got a more mature 3d capability and is OGL accelerated.

For all other compositing, c2. The Keyer and Color Corrector are soo money.

04 April 2003, 08:18 PM
Hy ostov
I don't know the reason why you are asking this question, but I am curios.
I personaly like more Combustion over AfterFX. For me it was easyer to learn combustion, I like more the interface and the workflow. And maybe I like it just becouse I'm more used to it. For me it's more a question of feeling ... :)
I understand that they both work very fine. If you consider buying one of them, I suggest that first look for each one's tech specs to be able to chose the best one for your hardware configuration.

04 April 2003, 08:46 PM
Thx for the replys:beer:

hndiw - I am just asking becaus I wanne know:)


05 May 2003, 05:14 PM
that pool doesnt suit me! I use both! :thumbsup:

CGTalk Moderation
01 January 2006, 01:00 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.