PDA

View Full Version : MERCURY VERSION 2


SidBan
06-05-2010, 05:10 PM
http://assets.cgsociety.org/nvart/190964_1275754205/680bound
(http://assets.cgsociety.org/nvart/190964_1275754205/1024bound)By keeping in mind of MERCURY VERSION 1, I designed MERCURY VERSION 2. This machine can travel on land at the speed of light.The main body is surrounded by a gigantic Rim(Tyre). The sphere like structure is the multistoried main body with two boosters(nuclear power generator for endless acceleration and power) attached at both sides to generate accelaration.Comparatively small spheres are surrounded along with the main body lying beneath the Rim(Tyre) and the mainbody, thus help the Rim(Tyre) to run.Two legs are also attached at the two sides of the main body to keep balance while running and turning.The vehicle can rotate on its own axis upto 360 degree at any time.Thus the vehicle is a complete and comprehensive road runner of the coming centuries.

To have a descriptive view follow the link below :

http://www.sharecg.com/v/41848/3D-and-2D-Art/mercury-version-2-description

To have a descriptive view follow the link below :





http://www.sharecg.com/v/41848/3D-and-2D-Art/mercury-version-2-description

cgdigi
06-05-2010, 06:51 PM
cool concept ;) love the simplicity on this.. good luck ^__^

LostTraveler
06-06-2010, 10:40 AM
nice render and color palete

SidBan
06-06-2010, 06:27 PM
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.Like "mercury version 1" I made "MERCURY VERSION 2" simple and cool.This machine can pickup acceleration as fast as light within a flash, beacause of its streamline shape there is hardly any resistance at all.The rotation of the wheel is a simple ball bearing concept.

I am developimg another concept.Hope i present that as early as possible.

Kakkoii
06-09-2010, 09:09 AM
Nice job on the render.

But what about general relativity? If it reached the speed of light it would turn into pure energy... And regardless of what materials it's made out of, you wouldn't survive long enough to get anywhere close to the speed of light, even in space where there's no resistance, due to the increase in mass relative to speed.

If you don't mind, I would suggest describing it as having the ability to warp space around it to travel to a point as fast, or faster than light could, without actually having to reach such a velocity. This is a theory of faster than light travel that has not yet been proven possible or impossible. Where as just normally going the speed of light has been proven impossible..

SidBan
06-12-2010, 05:22 PM
Thanks Kakkoii (http://forums.cgsociety.org/member.php?u=382833) for your practical comments.This is right that according to our knowledge nothing can travel as fast as light can.



The Human Civilisation has experienced many inventions and Happenings from the very early stage from the time of Caveman or even before to till date.We did not know the use of Fire/Wheel etc , but it is the necessity that made possible the inventions.

There were time when we do not know how to fly also, but there is a strong determination and dream that made us fly and we invented the Aeroplane , later on the spaceships that made us possible to reach the space and even explore the moon.



Even if in the present time we experience various science fiction movies where we observe various equipements and spaceships which we did not experience in practical life.These are dreams and desires “ If this could happen” or “It is the next gen necessity”.



Similarly I describe my product as “ It can travel as fast as light”.We humans have our limitations also.We can calculate at a certain point, at the same time we can experience many things like Observe, Smell, Taste according to our limitations of the Sense organs.

What we cannot see or hear doesnot mean that it does not exist. It exist, maybe in some other form. While traveling at the speed of light, may be the whole thing can transform into some other form depending upon its acceleration .Right now it is not possible for me to define what will happen when it is on its full acceleration/ because presently I don’t have that much knowledge to define.



But right now it can be defined as an advertisement “punch line” of my creation or product.

Kakkoii
06-12-2010, 06:38 PM
"What we cannot see or hear doesnot mean that it does not exist. It exist, maybe in some other form."

You're half right there. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it doesn't mean it exists either. One has to employ deductive reasoning to decide whether it would even be likely for such a thing to exist.

And you actually say: "This machine can travel on land at the speed of light."

There's a bit of a difference..

"Right now it is not possible for me to define what will happen when it is on its full acceleration/ because presently I don’t have that much knowledge to define."

Well I did give you a likely and half believable solution to replace the already proven impossible solution..

SidBan
06-30-2010, 02:30 PM
Thanks Kakkoii (http://forums.cgsociety.org/member.php?u=382833)



For the past few weeks I had gone through some articles in internet about FTL.This definations are similar as you want me to describe my machine “Mercury version 2”.I only gathered the information but am not able to feel the difference between traveling at the speed of light and traveling at warp speed. I think to realize this concept one must need a solid base in physics which presently I do not have.



I only imagine a machine which can move the fastest and it is the acme of my accelerated imagination that gave birth to such descriptions with relevant contradictions which is at the same time verymuch interesting.



Presently I am accepting the definition of traveling at warp speed.



To support this information I am furnishing with the following details.

This is for your information.



http://www.angelfire.com/nj/FTLphysics/ (http://www.angelfire.com/nj/FTLphysics/)



Faster Than Light (FTL) processes have been condemned and restricted to SCI-FI Domain. However, new research is demonstrating that travelling at warp speed is no more a matter of fantasy but a reachable reality for the new millennium.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light)



http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html (http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)

I am attaching another image of Mercury Version 2 on different background and perspective.
(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)

http://features.cgsociety.org/newgallerycrits/g64/190964/190964_1277903811_large.jpg
(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)

Kakkoii
06-30-2010, 10:02 PM
Thanks Kakkoii (http://forums.cgsociety.org/member.php?u=382833)



For the past few weeks I had gone through some articles in internet about FTL.This definations are similar as you want me to describe my machine “Mercury version 2”.I only gathered the information but am not able to feel the difference between traveling at the speed of light and traveling at warp speed. I think to realize this concept one must need a solid base in physics which presently I do not have.



I only imagine a machine which can move the fastest and it is the acme of my accelerated imagination that gave birth to such descriptions with relevant contradictions which is at the same time verymuch interesting.



Presently I am accepting the definition of traveling at warp speed.



To support this information I am furnishing with the following details.

This is for your information.



http://www.angelfire.com/nj/FTLphysics/ (http://www.angelfire.com/nj/FTLphysics/)



Faster Than Light (FTL) processes have been condemned and restricted to SCI-FI Domain. However, new research is demonstrating that travelling at warp speed is no more a matter of fantasy but a reachable reality for the new millennium.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light)



http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html (http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)

I am attaching another image of Mercury Version 2 on different background and perspective.
(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)


(http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html)

Good to hear, and lookin good :)

There's a simple way to understand the difference between travelling faster than light and warping somewhere. Imagine the space between one planet and another is a flat plane, a piece of paper. You could travel all the way across it at the fastest physically possible, or you could find a way to fold the 2 ends of the paper (space) so that the distance isn't actually that far. Thus getting there faster than light could, without actually moving at such a speed. This is one example of warp speed.

Another theory is creating a ship where the space in front and behind are warped in opposite volumes of each other to move the ship through space without the actual ship reaching any real velocity. Same concept, different approach.

But it all comes down to the theory of being able to warp space. There are of course some other FTL travel theories out there also, but the warping space ones are the most accepted and researched at this point.

It's all quite interesting to read into, easy to get hooked on science!

SidBan
07-07-2010, 05:29 PM
Thanks Kakkoii (http://forums.cgsociety.org/member.php?u=382833)



Yes I could understand, but at the same time not able to feel, what I actually mean is that as we observe the sun at the daytime and the stars and moon at night is it possible for a person to observe the above discussion physically.



Another thing is that “Imagine the space between one planet and another is a flat plane”

What exactly does it mean “Imagine the space between one planet”.

Can you draw the concept .



Regarding your second theory “Another theory is creating a ship where the space in front and behind are warped in opposite volumes of each other to move the ship through space without the actual ship reaching any real velocity. Same concept, different approach.”



Can you draw the concept so that it would be easier for me to understand.



Regards

siddhartha

CGTalk Moderation
07-07-2010, 05:30 PM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.