PDA

View Full Version : Golden Sunrise in Fairy Land (WIP)


EyeSeeBlack
11-13-2009, 11:35 AM
Hi!
My new work in progress. Now I'am working with sky, waterfalls and architecture

http://i057.radikal.ru/0911/81/0178747c868a.jpg (http://www.radikal.ru)

refs

http://s06.radikal.ru/i179/0911/1e/efe50773876c.jpg (http://www.radikal.ru)

wip

http://i080.radikal.ru/0911/86/f37fc7f50f07.jpg (http://www.radikal.ru)

shamanik
11-13-2009, 11:45 AM
Nice work!

EyeSeeBlack
11-13-2009, 02:05 PM
Thank's, Igor!

JJASSO
11-13-2009, 08:15 PM
this is beautiful , very well done, the only thing I would do to make it more photoreal is add a little little depth of field to it, the forefground a little bit out of focus, also a bit more atmosphere so the horse rider looks more real and with proper scale, right now it is an excellent illustration but remember to make photo real stuff you have to see through the eyes of a photo camera and what it does to an image, I hope I made myself clear

EyeSeeBlack
11-13-2009, 09:20 PM
this is beautiful , very well done, the only thing I would do to make it more photoreal is add a little little depth of field to it, the forefground a little bit out of focus, also a bit more atmosphere so the horse rider looks more real and with proper scale, right now it is an excellent illustration but remember to make photo real stuff you have to see through the eyes of a photo camera and what it does to an image, I hope I made myself clear

Jaime! Thank you very much for your opinion! :buttrock: :bounce: :buttrock:
Really and absolutly agree with you. I'll try to make the final version more photorealistic and less than illustration :) :beer:

JJASSO
11-13-2009, 10:25 PM
hey , I didn't say it was not photoreal it is pretty cool actually, I just adviced that with some camera effects like depth of field, a bit of film grain and all those camera effects, it will look definitely awesome and photoreal like taken out from a movie shot !

EyeSeeBlack
11-13-2009, 11:33 PM
hey , I didn't say it was not photoreal it is pretty cool actually, I just adviced that with some camera effects like depth of field, a bit of film grain and all those camera effects, it will look definitely awesome and photoreal like taken out from a movie shot !

O.K., Jaime! :) Thank you again! :buttrock: :buttrock: :buttrock:

TomasWarren
11-14-2009, 12:13 AM
Hey EyeSeeBlack

amazing job! beautiful colours and detail. Thanks for adding your wip and background work

no crits from me, keep it up :)

EyeSeeBlack
11-14-2009, 12:29 AM
Hey EyeSeeBlack

amazing job! beautiful colours and detail. Thanks for adding your wip and background work

no crits from me, keep it up :)

Thank you! :)

Fanko
11-14-2009, 10:42 AM
Lovely! i like painterly and photorealistic matte painting

EyeSeeBlack
11-14-2009, 03:22 PM
Lovely! i like painterly and photorealistic matte painting

Thanks, MileDream!

nickmarshallvfx
11-14-2009, 06:29 PM
Not bad at all EyeSeeBlack!
Completely agree with Jaime's comments. I would actually lose the horse and rider altogther. A little light bloom on the foreground elements and some of that mist coming into play at the base of the rocks on the right to tie it all together and it will be a really nice job!
Thanks for sharing!

Nick

EyeSeeBlack
11-14-2009, 07:44 PM
Thanks, Nick!

andalusite
11-15-2009, 01:27 PM
A very nice painting. I particulalry like the palette.
I have dabbled in matte painting but Im never sure how or where to obtain ref images.
Can you give some idea where you obtained the images for this piece?

EyeSeeBlack
11-15-2009, 03:39 PM
A very nice painting. I particulalry like the palette.
I have dabbled in matte painting but Im never sure how or where to obtain ref images.
Can you give some idea where you obtained the images for this piece?

Thank's, andalusite!
About refs:
http://mattepainting.org/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=13

EyeSeeBlack
11-17-2009, 03:06 AM
final version

http://i067.radikal.ru/0911/f4/99d304c10e8d.jpg (http://www.radikal.ru)

http://i046.radikal.ru/0911/43/91d1a1b249a5.jpg (http://www.radikal.ru)

Matellis
11-17-2009, 03:27 AM
Great work, The final turned out really nice :)

But hows that horse going to get down?! ;)

Keep up the good work!

EyeSeeBlack
11-17-2009, 03:45 AM
Great work, The final turned out really nice :)

But hows that horse going to get down?! ;)

Keep up the good work!

Hi, Matellis! :) This is a Richard's I monument )))
Thank you! :)

everlite
11-17-2009, 02:51 PM
Ok,

Pretty :)

The black levels are varying across the painting especially in the foreground. Remember things further away are lighter and knocked back compared to foreground. Check the fence to the bottom left as an example.

Different hot points on the castle, white, yellow, orange? uniform them a little, especially where they're angled towards the same direction.

The lighting around the castle is pretty, but in some areas reminds me of a 1970s dance floor. See the foreground element, left.

Background mountains are a little bland, very flat, could do with a little more definition.

Purely asthetics but ... is that knight stranded? poor horse :) looks like he's about to take a very big leap of faith!

One tree with leaves another without?

Waterfall to the right looks very painterly.

Why do i see so many paintings that are over sharpened and finished with a photoshop film grain?

Background sky looks nice, and over all pleasing composition, though you could do with bringing the castle more to the center, just a little.

Not bad, but could be refined :)

Dave.

EyeSeeBlack
11-17-2009, 03:07 PM
Thank's Everlite for your opinion! )))))))))

TomasWarren
11-18-2009, 11:18 AM
The horse and rider is a statue i think...?:shrug:

this piece has a bit of a lotr rivendell feel to it...

EyeSeeBlack
11-18-2009, 01:06 PM
The horse and rider is a statue i think...?:shrug:

this piece has a bit of a lotr rivendell feel to it...

Yes, this is monument. Look at final ref.
Rivendell? Hmmm, I don't think so.

TomasWarren
11-18-2009, 10:25 PM
Yeah you're right, it just reminded me a little of this
(http://www.dusso.com/images/mp02/MP45.jpe) http://www.dusso.com/images/mp02/MP45.jpe for some reason, don't know why heh..

good job :)

h0udini
11-28-2009, 08:13 AM
Nice work, colors are awesome.
And thanks for the breakdown !

joshfilms
11-30-2009, 03:33 AM
Really nice work and thanks for the breakdowns!

-Josh

b_52
12-06-2009, 06:18 PM
amazing job! beautiful colours and detail

sundialsvc4
12-07-2009, 01:11 AM
I guess I find myself wondering why the light-play across the foreground is not consistent with the other layers of depth ... particularly since there seems to be just a hint of the more-appropriate treatment along the leading edge of the fence.

There's also an obvious visual inconsistency in the first crop ... "obvious," at least, when one points it out. On the right-hand side of the frame, the large size (hence, close proximity) of the jagged wooden tree, plus the improbably-placed waterfall, plus the very great distance of the knight-in-shining-armor, simply cannot be reconciled one against the other. They basically share the same rock wall: hence, they are impossible.

The second crop, therefore, is much the stronger ... and it does just fine without the distracting details present in the first. "Merely answer me why the edge-light on that fence-line should be so, and I shall be happy." Better yet, give this area uniformly the same kind of color-treatment that is seen elsewhere, by presumably the same setting (or rising) sun. The absence of both the waterfall and the (inexplicably, unlit) "brave knight" is not to be mourned.

LouisBrowne
12-18-2009, 11:30 AM
It's fantastic that u showed your process. Thanks

TomasWarren
12-18-2009, 07:57 PM
There's also an obvious visual inconsistency in the first crop ... "obvious," at least, when one points it out. On the right-hand side of the frame, the large size (hence, close proximity) of the jagged wooden tree, plus the improbably-placed waterfall, plus the very great distance of the knight-in-shining-armor, simply cannot be reconciled one against the other. They basically share the same rock wall: hence, they are impossible.

If you look closely the branch on the right is not sprouting from the cliff, it's coming from off frame in the close foreground, at a proximity similar to the branch on the left.

Better yet, give this area uniformly the same kind of color-treatment that is seen elsewhere, by presumably the same setting (or rising) sun.

I think it's fine. The lighting treatment in this matte creates more depth within the image. Photographically, it's perfectly natural for foreground objects to expose as dark with a glancing highlight or bounce light as seen here.

proconpictures
12-19-2009, 10:26 AM
Don't be afraid to push FG>MG>BG more in your future paintings.
Depending on the humidity and therefore photons in the atmosphere,
things do often fall off a lot stronger/quicker than we tend to think.
Just a thought for upcoming personal pieces you might be working on...

EyeSeeBlack
12-21-2009, 06:18 AM
Thank's guys for all of your opinions!

CGTalk Moderation
12-21-2009, 06:18 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.