The Animation for Car_X8

[TIME1210]

more images

http://forums.cgsociety.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=145741&stc=1

[realtuke]

Great work!!! well done!!!:thumbsup:

[TRick]

Technically very impressive :applause: . Although I would have chosen for a real person, because the character (and the curtains at the beginning ;) ) does not fit the CG-realisme. The story is a bit cartoonish, so the realisme (for at least the surroundings) could be a bit less, which would fit the character and the story/script more. Some more expression (hints) in the interaction with the character before he starts his spectacular ride would be welcome: looking through the curtains, grabbing the keys and pushing the elevator button don't help the story and don't fit the cartoonish continuation...

[TIME1210]

:) Great work!!! well done!!!:thumbsup:

thanks

[TIME1210]

Technically very impressive :applause: . Although I would have chosen for a real person, because the character (and the curtains at the beginning ;) ) does not fit the CG-realisme. The story is a bit cartoonish, so the realisme (for at least the surroundings) could be a bit less, which would fit the character and the story/script more. Some more expression (hints) in the interaction with the character before he starts his spectacular ride would be welcome: looking through the curtains, grabbing the keys and pushing the elevator button don't help the story and don't fit the cartoonish continuation...


Thanks for your suggestions

[ManDay]

Hi, impressive sourroundings. I agree to TRick that the animated character is too strikingly artificial in a photorealsitic shot.

Criticism:

The interior of the car and its chassis need to look a little less silk. A little less reflective, a little darker, a little less specular.

The car neds a little more weight put into it. Again, the environment is photorelaistic but the car moves like a toy with an invible child moving it arround. I think it's mainly the lack of inertia - in turns aswell as in landings after jumps. A car of this kind has stiff dampers whereas the car in the animation "bounces like a spring"

I think the area where you need to put more work in is in the overall physics of the car. For example when it crosses the tiled rooftops, it looks like it's being pulled by a string. It doesn't look very authentic because in reality these bumps would likely have crashed the whole gearing - if the car would have been able to climb over then at all.

[wizard0713]

Hi, impressive sourroundings. I agree to TRick that the animated character is too strikingly artificial in a photorealsitic shot.

Criticism:

The interior of the car and its chassis need to look a little less silk. A little less reflective, a little darker, a little less specular.

The car neds a little more weight put into it. Again, the environment is photorelaistic but the car moves like a toy with an invible child moving it arround. I think it's mainly the lack of inertia - in turns aswell as in landings after jumps. A car of this kind has stiff dampers whereas the car in the animation "bounces like a spring"

I think the area where you need to put more work in is in the overall physics of the car. For example when it crosses the tiled rooftops, it looks like it's being pulled by a string. It doesn't look very authentic because in reality these bumps would likely have crashed the whole gearing - if the car would have been able to climb over then at all.
U R right,warm critic and comment

[TIME1210]

dynamics and the weight of the car is indeed a sense of our weakness， Your suggestion is impressive，Thanks

[CGTalk Moderation]

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.