View Full Version : new site is launched
reorom 06-19-2003, 08:22 AM I have created a website on 3d modeling & 3d arts.Please be kind enough to see the site & send me feedback to improve my artworks.Thank U
site address:-
www.geocities.com/romainperera (http://www.geocities.com/romainperera) :) :)
|
|
StormCyko
06-19-2003, 03:37 PM
Just quickly...
I think you should rename "Cock Can" to "Coke Can".
And "Dolphine" should be "Dolphin".
Nice models though :) I am an absolute, total beginner so I am just working my way through whatever tutorials I can find :p
I did notice one of the glasses was casting a total shadow, but the other images seem to have that fixed. Also the glass in all of the images does look quite fake, I have no idea how you would fix this :)
Ian Jones
06-25-2003, 12:23 PM
Dude, I would be pretty careful what you try to claim as "yours"... I'm warning you right now that I have my eye on you.
LoTekK
06-26-2003, 03:26 AM
And don't take his threats lightly, either. If it turns out you've claimed other people's artwork as your own, you'll have more than just Ian on your tail.
Ian Jones
06-26-2003, 04:50 AM
Just to clarify...
The image on the top left, the clock face and world. Looks suspiciously similar to a pic found within: 3ds max 4 - Media Animation, by John P. Chismar.
The image at the top right also looks like its from the same book and cd. Besides that I would be feel pretty nervous using the NBC peacock logo.
A few other images on that page also rang a bell when I saw them. I can't put my finger on it... but some of them also look familiar.
Streamlight
06-26-2003, 02:50 PM
Maybe they are from tutorials. Yea. romainperera you have to watch out... it's not good to claim other work as yours... very not good. If they are tutorials make sure you make that clear, lest you be in big troubles.........
LoTekK
06-27-2003, 12:01 AM
Quite frankly, in addition to Ian's comment, what got me thinking about it was the huge difference in the apparent quality of some of the images compared to the majority. While it could possibly mean that he put up a bunch of his older stuff alongside some newer renders, the difference in skill level between, say, the USP Match, and the F1 racer, just seem astrologically vast.
That said, I hope we're simply erring on the side of paranoia and he comes in to clarify.
aliencore
06-27-2003, 01:34 AM
Would it make a difference if he credited the artist or tutorial?
Streamlight
06-27-2003, 01:39 AM
yea, I think it would. I personally dont see anything wrong with having work on your site that is from a tutorial as long as you credit the tutorial and the creator. I mean, I know showing tutorial work wont get you anywhere except for the knowledge that you gain from it, but when your starting out I dont see anything wrong with it as long as you give credit where it's due.
Ian Jones
06-27-2003, 01:45 AM
ok, so tutorial work if reference I don't see a problem with it. But, the MSNBC and NBC peacock... thats another story. Not to mention that it is likely taken from the book I mentioned. I could be wrong, and if so I apologize but I am still suspicious of it.
reorom
06-27-2003, 10:38 AM
i will correct it thank u for feedbacks
Ian Jones
06-27-2003, 01:46 PM
Lesson learnt, glad to see you fixed it. :)
LoTekK
06-27-2003, 02:12 PM
We all gotta start somewhere. :) Welcome to CGTalk. :)
CGTalk Moderation
01-15-2006, 10:00 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
vBulletin v3.0.5, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.