LRomero
02-22-2008, 10:51 AM
Hey guys and gals,
I'm somewhat new to CGSociety in that I haven't really posted. I've visited the site through the years just by observation and checking on it once in a while but never really participating. It was only recently that I decided to go ahead and start developing it. So with that in mind I am hoping that this topic is in the right place.
The topic I want to discuss is the technique of art criticism.
I wanted to bring this up because last night I was making a general constructive crticism crit on a person's artwork on here (I won't mention names of course) and he/she decides to either delete his/her artwork or remove me from seeing it?
Now this could be because he/she couldn't take a harsh crit or the fact that he/she could not take my crit seriously because I haven't loaded up my portfolio yet. I didn't troll or flame the piece. I simply made general remarks about composition and techniques only being backfired that I don't have artwork in my portfolio to back up my remarks? LOL?
Whether I mention my art schooling or whether I don't, it makes no difference. If you post on a digital art forum, no one's gonna kiss your ass all the time. Hell if I post something up on here I expect it to either both accepted and critiqued with criticism openly. I as taught that a good harsh crit is better than a good comment with a bad thought in their mind.
So I ask you guys what is your opinion on a good critique.. does it HAVE to come from a person who has 'credentials'? Would you simply post a "OMG THATS SO AWESOME!" and give a pat on the back on a work that needs improvement?
I'm somewhat new to CGSociety in that I haven't really posted. I've visited the site through the years just by observation and checking on it once in a while but never really participating. It was only recently that I decided to go ahead and start developing it. So with that in mind I am hoping that this topic is in the right place.
The topic I want to discuss is the technique of art criticism.
I wanted to bring this up because last night I was making a general constructive crticism crit on a person's artwork on here (I won't mention names of course) and he/she decides to either delete his/her artwork or remove me from seeing it?
Now this could be because he/she couldn't take a harsh crit or the fact that he/she could not take my crit seriously because I haven't loaded up my portfolio yet. I didn't troll or flame the piece. I simply made general remarks about composition and techniques only being backfired that I don't have artwork in my portfolio to back up my remarks? LOL?
Whether I mention my art schooling or whether I don't, it makes no difference. If you post on a digital art forum, no one's gonna kiss your ass all the time. Hell if I post something up on here I expect it to either both accepted and critiqued with criticism openly. I as taught that a good harsh crit is better than a good comment with a bad thought in their mind.
So I ask you guys what is your opinion on a good critique.. does it HAVE to come from a person who has 'credentials'? Would you simply post a "OMG THATS SO AWESOME!" and give a pat on the back on a work that needs improvement?
