PDA

View Full Version : [Q] Best way to do this animation?


shoutaway
04-02-2003, 10:28 AM
Hi all,

I'm going to make an animation using multiple boxes.
I want to make the multiple boxes fly from all directions randomly then become a letter 'a'.

I'm sure you can do it manually by frame-by-frame animation, which doesn't seem to be a clever way to do it.
The boxes would be around 100.

Any suggestion will be appreciated
Thx in advance

shoutaway

gaggle
04-02-2003, 11:13 AM
Off the top of my head I'm thinking dynamics. Build the letter with the boxes, assign weights and stuff to them via Reactor, and blow them apart by a force. Play the sequence backwards, and hey presto, they form an A. Would that work?

That, or I'm thinking particles. But you may need a 3rd party plugin to get particles to form to a specific pattern properly and such (Sandblaster I think one was called, or Thinking Particles could do it as well, etc.)

shoutaway
04-03-2003, 12:02 PM
thx gaggle. Do you know any good reference or tutorial for particles ?

I have tried PArray..well it doesn't really do what I want to do.

cheers

mouj
04-03-2003, 12:14 PM
Howdy !

Somehow gaggle i think is right, particles would be the way to go, but i don't know if you'd be able to do so using standard particles systems in Max.
Maybe to achieve the effect you'd need to create it backwards ? Start by placing your cubes as an "A" and then make them fly around, and either reverse your frames upon rendering or later on.
Actually thinking of it this way i wonder if the simpliest way would not be to actually start from the "A", and use splines and path controllers to animate the cubes..

mouj

shoutaway
04-04-2003, 11:44 AM
Hi, this (http://www.shoutaway.com/3d/A_particles.avi) is what I've done so far.
I used Particle studio. that killed my machine many times so i couldn't really tested it properly.
http://www.shoutaway.com/3d/A_particles.avi
Anyone knows better way to do this?

cheers

CGTalk Moderation
01-14-2006, 07:00 PM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.