PDA

View Full Version : Benchmark 3dsmax


tuba3d
06-18-2007, 09:58 PM
Hi folks!:thumbsup:


I'm from Brazil, and I have developed together with other 3d fellas a 3D Benchmark site to compare computer rendering speeds. The idea is to help everyone to choose a new computer and to evaluate your current one.

The site still is in portuguese, but a.s.a.p. I'll add an english version.

It will be great if you can contribute with some results.:applause:

The link is: http://www.benchmark3d.uni.cc


[]s
Tuba3d

tuba3d
07-04-2007, 02:58 AM
Well, a little bit late.... :bounce:


Finally I translated it to (bad) english. please find the version here: www.benchmark3d.uni.cc/index_e.php (http://www.benchmark3d.uni.cc/index_e.php).

Come on guys, send us some results to populate this public performance group.


[]s
tuba3d

evanfotis
07-05-2007, 08:33 PM
ok, newbee Q:
how does one keep track of render times in3dsmax.
The render window closes as soon as its done.

tuba3d
07-05-2007, 08:38 PM
evan,

Just after render finishes, at the status line (below at your left) you could see:
Render Time: XX:XX
[]s

tuba3d

evanfotis
07-05-2007, 08:54 PM
Ok, here goes:
Specs:3dsmax r8
WInXP Pro 32

Processor: Intel Core Duo T2500 2.0GHz
Memory: 2,048MB
Video Card: nVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX w/512MB GDDR3




Render times:





320x240: 19sec
640x480: 51sec
1024x768: 1min 42sec
2048x1536: 5min 46sec
trivia:
3dsmax used around 300mb in task manager, with both cpus 98=%, also running FF: 65mb, and TB:47mb ram

btw,
isn't there a script or something that keeps a log of renders like in other apps (AE)?

tuba3d
07-05-2007, 09:02 PM
hi evan

Thanks for you contribution!
Could you please inform you OS?

Your results have been already published.

I really dont know any script to log render times.

[]s
tuba3d

tuba3d
07-17-2007, 07:41 PM
http://www.tresd1.com.br/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif Hy guys!

Finally I bought a new PChttp://www.tresd1.com.br/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

Find my results:

*Processor: Core 2 Duo 6420
*Brand.: Intel
*Clock (normal): 2.130
*Clock (overclocked): 2.130
*Motherboard: Asus P5B Deluxe WiFi
*Memory: 4096
Mem. Brand: Kingston DDR667
*Mem. Clock: 667
Videoboard: Asus GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB
*3dsmax: 9 SP2 PB1
*OS: XP 64 SP 2
Render times
*1 (320x240): 12
*2 (640x480): 31
*3 (1024x768): 65
*4 (2048x1536): 212
*Total: 320

Bye!

[]s
tuba3d

tecton3d
07-18-2007, 11:44 PM
for giggles:
tyan k8we mobo
dual opteron 248 (single core)
4gb ram...

1 - 320x240 -- 23sec
2 - 640x480 -- 1min 5sec
3 - 1024x768 -- 2min 5sec
4 - 2048x1536 -- 6min 31sec

may treat myself to an upgrade soon :D

proust:beer:

tuba3d
07-31-2007, 02:24 PM
Hi Tecton


I updated your result on the table. Thanks for sending it.
I have tried some basic (timid) overclocking on my PC, here are the results:

2130(266): 12/31/65/212 = 320 sec (original)
2240(280): 12/30/61/201 = 304 sec
2360(295): 11/28/58/191 = 288 sec
2480(310): 10/27/55/182 = 274 sec
2560(320): 10/26/54/176 = 266 sec

Slowly I'll push it far away ;)


[]s
tuba3d

RPG2006
08-01-2007, 08:08 PM
Here you go Tuba. Downloaded trial 32bit Max and scene.

Machine Spec
OP Win XP Pro
Q6600 GO @ 425x9 (3.825ghz)
Memory 2GB Geil 8500 Cas 4 5:6 1020 mhz 4-4-4-8-30
MB Abit IP35 Pro

Going by last frame render times (Is that right?)

320x240 6 seconds
640x480 15 seconds
1024x768 30 seconds
2048x1536 1 min 36 seconds

Just waiting for the 8 cores to eat these times for breakfast:)

RPG

tecton3d
08-01-2007, 11:11 PM
Here you go Tuba. Downloaded trial 32bit Max and scene.

Machine Spec
OP Win XP Pro
Q6600 GO @ 425x9 (3.825ghz)
Memory 2GB Geil 8500 Cas 4 5:6 1020 mhz 4-4-4-8-30
MB Abit IP35 Pro

Going by last frame render times (Is that right?)

320x240 6 seconds
640x480 15 seconds
1024x768 30 seconds
2048x1536 1 min 36 seconds

Just waiting for the 8 cores to eat these times for breakfast :)

RPG
:bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown:

tuba3d
08-02-2007, 01:21 AM
OMG!! :eek:

Thanks RPG for you test! The result is awesome....
I will need to purchase a quad some day :P

[]s
tuba3d

tuba3d
08-03-2007, 02:51 AM
Hi guys!


I have obtained a improved result on over... It is modest but I'm quite happy ;)

At 2960Mhz => 9/22/46/152 => 229 (compared with the 320 sec of the stock Clock :O )


[]s
tuba3d

RPG2006
08-04-2007, 04:45 AM
Tuba3d,

I've just had a look through your benches an I'm a bit confused by the results.

2nd place you have a QX6700 at stock speed (2.6ghz) ahead of my Q6600 at 3.825 ghz. And by quite a margin.

Well I've got a qx6700 as well and that just doesn't seem to add up.

The only difference I can see is the operating system, mine being xp pro and 2nd place being xp x64.

Does the op and version of max make such a huge difference?

How are you verifying the results?

RPG

tuba3d
08-04-2007, 01:06 PM
Hi Russell


In fact I'm not checking the info, because I'm quite unable to do it. Maybe doing some script that generates the result could be a solution, but for the time being I'm not capable to write some tool...

Here is the post that generated the result: http://www.tresd1.com.br/viewtopic.php?t=23556&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

If you could send me your results, I could ask him about the differences an request another test.


[]s
tuba3d

tuba3d
09-28-2007, 08:27 PM
Hey guys!
Anyone would like to add new results?? Maybe :bounce: a E6750 or the new Quad's?

Rgds
tuba3d

A-Boy-From-Heaven
10-02-2007, 09:56 AM
Hi, Here you are:

Specs:
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual 3800+
RAM: 2 GB
VGA: GeForce 7300 GS

Benchmarks:
1. 320x240: 19 sec
2. 640x480: 48 sec
3. 1024x768: 1 min 40 sec
4. 2048x1536: 5 min 25 sec

CGTalk Moderation
10-02-2007, 09:56 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.