cache
04-14-2007, 02:16 AM
hello !
i know there has been a topic like this, but that was too specific and general at the same time.. so if you dont mind, i would like to ask:
what is the best image sequence format for heavy compositing (lots of layers, lots of sequences) ?
of course i'm talking about uncompressed frames..
i know some have lossless compression option, but i dont know if its good to use or bad..
do these compressed formats require more cpu power but less hdd activity when uncompressing them to load them into memory ?
which are the fastest formats ?
what are the benefits/disadvantages of using these basic formats ?: png, tga, tiff, etc.
so as you can see, i'm a little lost, and i dont have the time to test all of them with precise testing of hdd/cpu activity etc..
please help me out with answers !
thanks !
i know there has been a topic like this, but that was too specific and general at the same time.. so if you dont mind, i would like to ask:
what is the best image sequence format for heavy compositing (lots of layers, lots of sequences) ?
of course i'm talking about uncompressed frames..
i know some have lossless compression option, but i dont know if its good to use or bad..
do these compressed formats require more cpu power but less hdd activity when uncompressing them to load them into memory ?
which are the fastest formats ?
what are the benefits/disadvantages of using these basic formats ?: png, tga, tiff, etc.
so as you can see, i'm a little lost, and i dont have the time to test all of them with precise testing of hdd/cpu activity etc..
please help me out with answers !
thanks !
