Female Studio Study, Mario Dubec (3D)

[kastaniga]

Very nice work... Texturing very succesfull but a woman (stand-up) 's face was not natural... Like a dead man :):) Wonderfull anatomy, body (modelling)...

Congratulations, good jobs....

[Silverwing]

Wery good and studio like
lighting! Good modeling and
textures too...

The standing womans head
looks a little "old" to me in
contrast to her body...

But although good work!
Thumbs up!

[digitalinkmind]

Nicely done... The modeling are superb...good lightning and textures.
Pretty smooth forms...very natural.:buttrock:
Hot stuff , dude.:thumbsup:

[formerself]

looks great, the standing one reminds me of Uma Therman a little

[Skooter]

you have some great modeling skills, very well done.
To be honest the standing womans face doesnt bug me that much but i see the point behind it being not natural enough.
What caught my eye though was actually the woman laying down and how her back looks way too long to me and how her spine is in what seems to be an uncomfortable arc. one last thing (sorry to be so picky, haha) the bum of the woman laying down seems to be positioned upstraight where it seems it should be slanted diagonally more in comparison to the position of the back to give a more relaxed, comfortable and natural feel.

but i havent really studied enough anatomy so dont take my advice to heart, just at first glance the back on the lady laying down seems odd. otherwise a very good image!
Cheers.
-Scott
**** stars from me.

[KrakenCMT]

Yes nice lighting and materials, but the woman's face does need a bit more work. And I agree with the comment about the back of the woman on the floor being too long. I should also comment that the standing woman's ribcage seems to run a bit too low on her torso. But overall, very nice!

[maxtorag]

thanks for comments, guys!
Regarding the lying character...the thing is I did it a little bit more bent than the reference, but don't be fooled, you would be surprised how close it is to real reference pose, athough quite unusual one...
lot's of people suggest to make some nice, smiling (maybe erotic emoted) faces...so maybe later ;)

[newellteapot]

Hi! I think you did a very good job, but as an anatomy enthusiast I want to make some constructive critique, hope you don't mind.
The thing that strikes me the most is that the ribcage is ending far too low, really far too low. Have a look at anatomical ref, you'll see what I mean.

[Chokmah]

Hi maxtorag !

I totally agree with monica-taddei about the ribcage.

However, you have some great modeling skills, and it's still a good image .

Good job!

:)

[maxtorag]

well, I take your critisism seriously...just what surprises me (and now I am not being sarcastic :) ) is that you pointed out position of ribcage (which is correct comparing to ref - the lying one has the rest of "curves" created by skin and muscles, if you mean that one) and you did not mention it's regularity (the real one are more non-straight)...if you really want to take a look at the ref:
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/2391/standingposeuc0.jpg
and (btw., mine pose is less stretched = lowest rib is proportionally lower but just in a small margin)
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/213/lyingposeai7.jpg

[Chokmah]

erf... It seems that you are right maxtorag ^^

You reference is a fact..

But the most important thing ... You have made a good job anyway :thumbsup:

[maxtorag]

erf... It seems that you are right maxtorag ^^

You reference is a fact..

But the most important thing ... You have made a good job anyway :thumbsup:

appreciate it and it gives me a satisfaction...:bounce:
I know my picture is far from perfect and I see the problematic areas...I just don't like when people say something is worng, while in realty something else is :)

[KrakenCMT]

You're right, maxtorag. It's not quite as far off as we made it out to be.

But it still doesn't look quite right, and I think I know why. In your reference, the model is twisted in a more extreme pose where yours is standing a bit straighter. The referenced model's torso is twisting toward the camera and her hips are twisting away. So in reality your model's ribcage does come down a bit lower and closer to the hips than the actual referenced model. Not as much as we initially thought, but it feels off enough to warrant a few people to notice it and bring it up, so I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss our observations.

[CGTalk Moderation]

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.