View Full Version : Athlon 64 X2 4200 vs Core 2 Duo E6300?
VanDerGoes 09-06-2006, 11:20 AM Hi, I'm building a new pc for my girlfriend but I can't decide about the cpu. I've read wonderfull things about the new intel chips, but I couldn't find any benchmark for the E6300. I know that the E6600 beats even the athlon fx62, but the E6300 has only 2 mb cache L2 and runs at 1.86 ghz (.54 ghz less than the E6600). Is it comparable to the athlon 64 X2 4200+?
Also, is intel's 64 bit technology as good as the amd's one?
Do you have any suggestion?
| |
prixatw
09-06-2006, 03:38 PM
Here is a post I did a few days ago.
Its a sort of average of averages which probably makes less than accurate but it still serves as a rough guide.
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=396987
VanDerGoes
09-07-2006, 03:02 PM
Thank you!
And about the 64 bit support?
Can anyone tell which one is better (or if it's just the same?)?
Intel's EMT64 should be fully compatible with AMD64. EMT64 is pretty much following AMD's specs, minus a few things which make AMD's implimentation a bit better, these differences should not change compatibilty though.
Intel also has another 64bit architecture, named IA-64 (IA-32 is what you find in 32bit x86 CPUs). The Itanium uses this, and it is a very different animal from the x86-64 that AMD created. It is not compatible with any previous x86 code or hardware.
VanDerGoes
09-08-2006, 08:49 AM
Very clear explanation!
Thanks a lot!!
CGTalk Moderation
09-08-2006, 08:49 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
vBulletin v3.0.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.