Vehicle: Messerschmitt

[BiTMAP]

looks very washed out on that backround, but if composited it would prolly look okay (depends) and uhh yeah it seems to be lackin a real depth to the texture..

[TheWraith]

yeah, if it's going to be flying past quickly or be far away it looks just fine as it is i think... but if theres going to be any close ups and detailed shots i agree that the textures lack depth. a bump map, specular map or even a displacement map depending on how close up we're talking would help out A LOT i think. other then that, looks great :)

[Lurb]

Great model. I wish I could do one as nice myself.

And now the nitpicking ;)... what kind of 109 is that one? the nose and wings seem 109-F but the air intake on the side is 109-E like. Most 109-Fs also had retracting tail wheels.

I would recheck the prop spinner too, the cannon shouldn't stick out that much and the shape seems a little off or maybe too big.

check this:
http://pub131.ezboard.com/fallboutwarfarefrm25.showMessage?topicID=67.topic

for nice reference pics and details.

[prasa]

Hmmm ... texture need more saturation ... illumination is bad ... good lightning can rapidly increase imression .... try use some good renderer with radiocity

[Braxton]

cool plane man!

are you interested in modelling military hardware in general? then you are kindly invited to come to our nice community called military-meshes.com

woudl love to see you posting stuff over there as well

click here (http://www.military-meshes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi)

cheers
Brax

[dsigna]

I believe proportion are not correct... not sure but I think the nose more chort... and others details... but its a good job;)

[CGTalk Moderation]

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.