2006 CGTALK interface

[erilaz]

Are you serious? :surprised

What is wrong with the colours? Would you prefer them to be more khaki?

[Per-Anders]

duh, they should be faster!

[SheepFactory]

I agree , the colors are way to slow.

but GOOD NEWS!

I am pleased to give you a sneak peek into cgtalks new face , coming in 2006. we listened to your concerns and redesigned the page , now it will look something along the lines of:

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8713/?200526


cant wait!

[tilite]

hahaha perfect Ali

[dbates]

YESSSS!!! Let's do it! Absolutely perfect!

[DevilHacker]

I think ill be great to improve the webpage of cgtalk for this upcoming year

honestly it looks like crap!
we need faster and better colors :wavey:Your joking right? :curious:
------------------------------

Also, you complain about site design... Why don’t you at least try to Photoshop an image of how you think it should look... At least then, people will understand what your talking about.

[Ravix]

LOL I apoloogize to insult the colours of such a great site, I just figure it out that actually someone reply to this. but I mean this looks is like shake, Xsi or combustion,, is pretty good ,but what i meant is something more white maybe and minimalistic , but more faster and easier to get into it. of course less comercials and more information. Lol wahtever sorry dudes.

Sheep factory lol.. i never so such a site ,, u make me a hedache !
and trying to find soemthing worst i found this link http://www.angelfire.com/super/badwebs/main.htm

:wavey:

[CGTalk Moderation]

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.