lyppeter
08-23-2002, 06:47 PM
hi everybody this is my texture exercise wish you like it ! Any critics and suggestions are welcome.
:p
:p
View Full Version : Shrek : my exercise
|
|
Houkah
08-23-2002, 08:29 PM
Hey good job on the texturing and modelling. Some quick crits are the repitition of the cloth texture seems higher on the body section of the shirt as opposed to the sleeves. Also Shreks right forearm (that's waving) looks really short. Other than that it looks good.
Titan
08-23-2002, 08:32 PM
youre textures are stretching around the sides and appear larger below the belt than in the top
you need to create a copy of the shirt, unwrap it, and apply a planar map..then use the copy as a morph target and morph it back to its original shape, and weld the verts back together
then it should be mapped correctly..
you need to create a copy of the shirt, unwrap it, and apply a planar map..then use the copy as a morph target and morph it back to its original shape, and weld the verts back together
then it should be mapped correctly..
lyppeter
08-24-2002, 02:10 AM
thank you very much ! it's a good way!!:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
sprite
08-26-2002, 06:44 AM
Shrek's left arm looks weird?
gr8 job!
gr8 job!
BluemoonX
08-26-2002, 07:07 AM
I think 1 of the hand looks longer than the other 1, maybe its beause of the angle of the shot
pensart
08-26-2002, 04:07 PM
what about copyright?
I'm just wondering since i always wanted to model a character of disney.
I'm just wondering since i always wanted to model a character of disney.
Totitch
08-26-2002, 04:10 PM
Good job!
Just one critic...Eyesa are a little too big...And pupils too...
But it's a nice work! :thumbsup:
Just one critic...Eyesa are a little too big...And pupils too...
But it's a nice work! :thumbsup:
beta
08-26-2002, 04:23 PM
Originally posted by pensart
what about copyright?
I'm just wondering since i always wanted to model a character of disney.
it doesn't matter unless he's making money off of what he copied.
what about copyright?
I'm just wondering since i always wanted to model a character of disney.
it doesn't matter unless he's making money off of what he copied.
roarty
08-26-2002, 04:33 PM
GREAT JOB!
the texturing is very well done and you have really modeled him well.
I would agree with the forearm being to short, there seems to be some misporportion in the arms, and the cloth around his elbow bend seems to look wrong,
but again what a great job!
thanx for sharing!
:D
the texturing is very well done and you have really modeled him well.
I would agree with the forearm being to short, there seems to be some misporportion in the arms, and the cloth around his elbow bend seems to look wrong,
but again what a great job!
thanx for sharing!
:D
pabbloz
08-26-2002, 04:42 PM
Good Job!
It's really Shrek! :eek: :thumbsup:
the head is really well done!
For me is perfect, but the only possible critics have already said them. :)
It's really Shrek! :eek: :thumbsup:
the head is really well done!
For me is perfect, but the only possible critics have already said them. :)
Ovi
08-26-2002, 09:28 PM
Looking good, but not perfect.
There is something with his mouth - can't tell exactly what, but try to make his lower lips a little bigger.
The skin seems to bright (i've been comparing :)).
Also, try lowering his stomach a little (making it hanging a little on the belt).
There is something with his mouth - can't tell exactly what, but try to make his lower lips a little bigger.
The skin seems to bright (i've been comparing :)).
Also, try lowering his stomach a little (making it hanging a little on the belt).
AJ
08-26-2002, 09:53 PM
Originally posted by beta
it doesn't matter unless he's making money off of what he copied.
This is a popular misconception... (one that I also believed until about a year ago). It's still copyright infringement - you're copying something that has a copyright on it! :shame:
Generally though, attention won't be brought to it unless it's making profit, since if you're making money of one of their creations - then people generally get the big book marked "Sue" out of their desk drawers. So chances are you won't get legally nailed for it - but understand that it still is copyright!
Anyway - Model looks good, something about the head makes it look more like a cartoon of Shrek (if that makes sense)
But the texture on the jacket looks good - try dirtying the texture on the shirt a bot more though, seems rather uniform at the mo. But all in all a mighty fine job! :D
it doesn't matter unless he's making money off of what he copied.
This is a popular misconception... (one that I also believed until about a year ago). It's still copyright infringement - you're copying something that has a copyright on it! :shame:
Generally though, attention won't be brought to it unless it's making profit, since if you're making money of one of their creations - then people generally get the big book marked "Sue" out of their desk drawers. So chances are you won't get legally nailed for it - but understand that it still is copyright!
Anyway - Model looks good, something about the head makes it look more like a cartoon of Shrek (if that makes sense)
But the texture on the jacket looks good - try dirtying the texture on the shirt a bot more though, seems rather uniform at the mo. But all in all a mighty fine job! :D
PureFire
08-27-2002, 03:25 AM
great movie and great job!:bounce:
lyppeter
08-27-2002, 04:42 AM
it's just a texture practice i am innosense! and i am poor ! :cry::cry:
Loveless
08-27-2002, 07:58 AM
er, thats like saying making fan art of dragonball z or something is illegal =\
Nice work :)
Nice work :)
yong
08-27-2002, 09:59 AM
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
AJ
08-28-2002, 10:05 PM
er, thats like saying making fan art of dragonball z or something is illegal
Yes. It is.
'Fanart' isn't in anyway a legal term/description. It doesn't exclude you from the fact that you have copied copyrighted material.
But of course, it would be a cruel company to take an individual to court over, and it would of course take a lot of time/money.
I'm not saying you shouldn't do it (I've copied absolutely shedloads of designs...) - just don't think that you couldn't get taken to court over it (sadly). :shrug:
Yes. It is.
'Fanart' isn't in anyway a legal term/description. It doesn't exclude you from the fact that you have copied copyrighted material.
But of course, it would be a cruel company to take an individual to court over, and it would of course take a lot of time/money.
I'm not saying you shouldn't do it (I've copied absolutely shedloads of designs...) - just don't think that you couldn't get taken to court over it (sadly). :shrug:
CGTalk Moderation
01-13-2006, 02:00 PM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
vBulletin v3.0.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.