PDA

View Full Version : Lunar Mission Descent, Karr Marquez - Media Fusion Inc. (3D)

karr1008
09-15-2004, 06:35 PM
http://www.cgnetworks.com/gallerycrits/35614/35614_1095273315_medium.jpg (http://www.cgnetworks.com/gallerycrits/35614/35614_1095273315.jpg)

Title: Lunar Mission Descent
Name: Karr Marquez - Media Fusion Inc.
Country: United States
Software: 3ds max

This images where generated in 3d studio max 6
for NASA's future space exploration to the Moon.
These are only conceptual developments and they may not reflect the actual final vehicle.

Although, this are finished images we think that
they can go even further. We appreciate any comments and crits that would help us produce better images in the future.

Thanks.

Karr

http://www.spaceanimation.com
http://www.fusiononline.com
starman
09-15-2004, 08:08 PM
Wow
i love this image .The colours and compostion are spot on !
hope you post more images soon !
F10
09-16-2004, 02:59 AM
Man, that looks ultra-real. Were u there? lol

Great job, top notch!
Ecleposs
09-16-2004, 07:06 AM
looks real...:thumbsup:
Artbot
09-16-2004, 07:32 PM
I really like it. Excellent detail modeling and lighting on the ships. My only crits are that the moon should have a hard edge to it and that the composition is too full. It looks like you placed the ships & planets and saw you had empty space left and tried to fill the holes with nebulae and gassy stars. These are not needed, imho, and only detract from the objects. Empty space is good and can help the objects you want people to focus on pop out more. Those extraneous elements do not make it any "prettier". Still a really nice image, though. http://www.cgtalk.com/images/icons/icon13.gif
karr1008
09-17-2004, 12:28 AM
Thank you guys for all your comments.
Like I said, any comment are very welcomed and helps me in future developements.

I Agree with Artbot. The stars and galaxies are way too pronounced and in fact they do
distract from the main protagonist, the lander. This shot is actually rendered from an animation where the starfield is in fact very faint and has motion blurr.

The reason for the "extra pixie stuff" (galaxies, nebulaes, etc) is because this had to be rendered very large so that they could use it as a large printed poster which is at NASA HQ.

Once again, thanks for the reviews.
Karr

P,S, I do have more images coming soon.
CGTalk Moderation
01-19-2006, 06:00 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.