PDA

View Full Version : Still: transparant lego x wing


dotblend
07-31-2002, 12:59 PM
hello, I renderd the following image on my p3 700 with 3d virtualight. I did a little afterwork in Photoshop rendertime was about 3 hours @ 2048*1536

http://www.dotblend.com/_images/medium/cg3d/xwing_composite_med.jpg

hires version can be found here (http://www.dotblend.com/_images/BIG/xwing_composite.jpg)

what do you think? like it?

damon579
07-31-2002, 01:18 PM
looks great, but in the high res, your shadows shouldnt have such defined edges. (the light passing through the colored LEGO pieces would not be the same exact size, edges and all, when it hits the table top as the pieces themselves.)

dotblend
07-31-2002, 01:22 PM
i know, but i will re-render this image with different lights... nou i used omni's i will use spots instead the next time.

damon579
07-31-2002, 01:24 PM
once you get that, it will look awesome :)

dotblend
07-31-2002, 04:48 PM
http://www.dotblend.com/_images/BIG/X_WING_LEGO_TRANSPARANT2800.jpg

still gotta do something about the light... :(

wedge
07-31-2002, 06:42 PM
what software?


i use maya. i wish maya had hdri like lightwave does :sad:

dotblend
07-31-2002, 06:58 PM
there is no radiosity in these images!

it's just a matter of placing the right lights at the right place

and the rendering software i use is also available for maya!

it's calles MVL check www.3dvirtualight.com

and I updated the images at my gallery
(there is no flash intro) no creepy code


http://www.dotblend.com/_images/XFIGHTER.html

DeViSoR
07-31-2002, 07:00 PM
I think the model looks werry good and interesting.. but IMO you should use just one shadow.. Looks more convinsing that way.

dotblend
07-31-2002, 07:12 PM
i'll give it a try

dotblend
07-31-2002, 08:05 PM
http://www.dotblend.com/_images/medium/cg3d/xwing_singlelight1.jpg

hires version here (http://www.dotblend.com/_images/XFIGHTER.html)

damon579
07-31-2002, 09:12 PM
getting closer :thumbsup: man, i wish i had some sort of constructive comment other than "keep working on it" but the shadows still do not look quite correct to me, and i have no clue how you could make them look better really :hmm:

dotblend
07-31-2002, 09:17 PM
anyone else some suggestions about how to make the shadows better? or maybe something else?

BgDM
08-01-2002, 12:02 AM
Hey buddy! Good to see you here as well!

As far as the shadow goes, I think the latest one looks pretty good. Not too crisp and not too faded either. Maybe a little bit darker shadow, but that is it.

Nice work, as always dotblend.

BgDM

dotblend
08-01-2002, 06:45 AM
next morning.... still rendering... this time i thought to do a "IBI" render... it's already rendering for about 10.21 hours...

dotblend
08-01-2002, 11:27 AM
http://www.dotblend.com/_images/big/washed_out.jpg
IBI render
(image based illumination)
the insult of 12 hours rendering....
damn i hate this when it happens!

damon579
08-01-2002, 11:45 AM
that one looks good, but you lost your color :hmm:

Hollis J Wood
08-01-2002, 12:13 PM
Man that really looks good:applause: , can my Lego Marine take it for a spin? :bounce:

playmesumch00ns
08-01-2002, 12:26 PM
On the lighting:

Instead of using IBI try using a dome of lights to fake GI. When you hit a certain threshold number, the results are indistinguishable from HDRI (with a little adjustment =) and the render times are a lot nicer

dotblend
08-01-2002, 12:34 PM
i dont need to fake gi
i can use gi... a really fast one!
when i render with a dome of lights it renders slower...
when i render with a dome that has a image on it for illumination (ibi) it goes way faster!

Neil
08-01-2002, 06:20 PM
<removed by admin>

MadS
08-01-2002, 09:19 PM
Hey Neil, find something more constructive to do with your time. :wip:

I'm diggin' the lighting on this render. I too wish Maya would comeout with something comparable to Final Render(with it's speed). You are getting closer and closer, and I think if you played around with some fill lights and some ambient lights, it might do the trick.

Neil
08-02-2002, 12:26 AM
How is my critique not constructive? I said the same thing you did, but merely did it visually instead of typing it, we are graphic artists, aren't we?

dotblend
08-04-2002, 12:42 PM
yes indeed "graphic" artists

CGTalk Moderation
01-13-2006, 12:00 PM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.