Character: In the Meadow [Mild Nudity]

[hesido]

Good job..

There is more depth of field blur in the nearby clouds than in the one's near the horizon, which are sharper.. Either try to make the nearby ones sharper, or make the distant ones more blurry (if you want to keep the same background/foreground contrast, the latter would be the choice, but the former also might work just fine)

The animal's skin detail doesn't match that of the woman's.. You can add a few more sharp details to the animal..

You might want to add [nudity] in the thread name , tho it is not erotic to general population, some might get offended?..

Anyway, keep it coming!

[Kragen]

Great especialy on the model real nice Choice of colors

[Riddick]

Kragen < Thank you

hesido <Thank you very much for your councils.
I will try to arrange little things.
For the sky I did not have to use the same form of brush and that does not make similar, unfortunately. :shrug:

[stuzzi]

great dude!:p

I like the woman's expression.

The animal's skin detail doesn't match that of the woman's.. You can add a few more sharp details to the animal
i'm agree with hesido,you need to add some details on the animal,the blur effect is too prononced in this pict.

[Riddick]

Thank you Stuzzi :beer:
There is more details in the sky and on the beast now.

[hesido]

Hi Riddick! With details I meant, sharpness of the details on the beast. Tho the new added details are ok to implement, I was talking about the sharpness of details mainly.. Sorry if I mislead you by-my comments, which stuzzi explained better..

Anyway this piece rox, it would only be better with a sharper skin details!

[Riddick]

Oh ok!
Well I'm using the reset brush so if the look doesn't please you, I'm not going to do an other illustration just because you don't like the aerograph rendering.
:shrug:

[hesido]

Don't get angry?!?!? :surprised:
ok fine, I guess we are having language problems here! I don't think you would make another illustration just because I wanted, LOL...

I am just trying to tell that the skin detail doesn't match the womans, because the woman's skin has "sharp" and "fine" details, but the animal looks blurred.

But I won't bother you anymore, don't worry my friend.

Just to make you happy, I am not as talented as you, but I do have a vision of my own that -might- help some others who are willing to accept comments more kindly.

Well you know what, when I began here, lildragon made some constructive comments in a thread of mine, which I thought was wrong, and I objected (tho I was still kind).. Now I realise I was wrong, there were some good points lildragon was trying to tell me. Now I can take most comments without any problems. Thanks to lildragon for teaching me one good lesson!

My 5 cents..

[Riddick]

I see what you wanted to say, now.

Try, maybe, to update the image because there are more details on the beast than before.
And in the sky also.
In fact the woman seems to be more detailed because she is smaller.
But in fact, it is the animal which is the most complex.

Thank you for your criticism because I understood that something did not work (for me at least).
It is not what you speak to me, this is an other thing.
But I will change this, in the next drawings.

:beer:

[Newke]

Another good job captain :thumbsup:

Just a comment : i think the muscles on the beast are...how can i say that...too..."hard", not enough rounded, in my opinion. As if the beast hasn't skin on his body.

But, great job as always !

[CGTalk Moderation]

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.