PDA

View Full Version : OT: SCO funded by Microsoft?


kilikili
03-05-2004, 03:42 PM
This is for all those running Linux on their machine at home or at work... especially for graphics.

What they said:

"For months, some in the software industry have speculated that Microsoft is surreptitiously and indirectly funding the SCO Group Inc.'s copyright-infringement campaign against Linux users and distributors. That speculation finally proved too difficult to ignore for SCO Thursday, when the company refuted it.
SCO maintains that parts of its copyrighted Unix System V source code were illegally used in the Linux open-source operating system. Linux has been winning converts at the expense of Microsoft Windows.

A leaked E-mail posted Wednesday on the Open Source Initiative's Web site appeared to provide evidence that SCO employees and a consultant were looking to Microsoft to help fund SCO's legal strategy and licensing initiatives.

The contractor reportedly is Mike Anderer, a consultant with S2 Strategic Consulting LLC. Open Source Initiative president Eric Raymond posted the E-mail and outlined in an article on the site what he sees as an inappropriately private partnership. OSI is a nonprofit corporation that manages the open-source trademark.

SCO vouched for the authenticity of the Oct. 12, 2003, E-mail exchange referred to by Raymond. It was sent from Anderer to Chris Sontag, SCO's general manager of SCOsource licensing, and SCO CFO Bob Bench. In it, Anderer writes that Microsoft was responsible for $86 million in funding to SCO. This includes a $50 million investment in SCO last October by venture fund BayStar Capital."

More >>> (http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18202021)

-Kilikili

bentllama
03-05-2004, 04:13 PM
die penguin die.

Spankspeople
03-05-2004, 05:38 PM
I was waiting for this. Not because I knew about the e-mail, or assumed that Microsoft had been funding them in the first place...

I was just waiting for something even more absurd than their sueing Dalmer-Chrysler to come up.

And the fact that they were originally intending to attempt to confiscate all of the Bank of America's unlicenced Linux machines beats this. It's getting pretty stupid though... I'm not entirely sure how they'll manage to top it.

I love the whole SCO debacle. It's just so hilarious to read about, and I'm always left wondering what they're going to do next.

If this whole case ends in anything less than apocalyptic exorcism I'll be very dissapointed.

nvvm
03-05-2004, 05:57 PM
I mentioned this in a thread here some time ago and everyone called me crazy. The argument has merits that no one has shot down.

Pumuckle
03-06-2004, 02:08 AM
Originally posted by bentllama
die penguin die.

i agree with you

playmesumch00ns
03-06-2004, 09:43 AM
Christ if only Gates would take Linux as a challenge to produce better software rather than trying to assasinate it.

Maybe there's a reason people are switching to Linux billy? Sort your life out rich boy.

I do love a good conspiracy theory

parallax
03-06-2004, 10:33 AM
Microsofts' good products not withstanding,

where there is smoke, there is fire.

Money = power = more money (haliburton et al for example, and lots of others. Or maybe MS is not about securing their market value and profit??)

:scream:




Thats i like to add to this thread, do what you like with it.

Spankspeople
03-08-2004, 10:22 PM
Well, seems that someone's looking into it (http://www.newsforge.com/trends/04/03/08/0457259.shtml).

Beamtracer
03-12-2004, 06:07 AM
More revelations today, proving that Microsoft funneled millions of dollars into SCO, to fund SCO's court challenge against Linux.

http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2004/03/11/scoms/index.php?redirect=1079042233000

People should try using other alternatives to Microsoft products.

CGTalk Moderation
01-14-2006, 02:00 AM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.