View Full Version : Athlon xp 2700+ or Barton 2800+
12-13-2003, 10:35 PM
The barton has a couple less mhz, but what is the major difference.
I figured that the bartons being newer probably had some better features?:shrug:
12-14-2003, 12:38 AM
512k L2 Cache
256k L2 Cache
From a 3sdmax standpoint, megahertz shows more of a performance gain then cache size.
Here's some maya benchies...
Lightwave's "about" the same.
In cinebench (Cinema 4D), the non barton processors are actually faster (higher megahertz).
12-14-2003, 12:59 AM
I see that rendertimes are obviously faster by a little bit with t-bred, but what would the 512k cache have as an advantage, or doesn't that really matter?
12-16-2003, 01:27 PM
the higher cache should give it an advantage, better to get a 2500 and set the fsb to 200mhz, or DDR400, this will give you the performance of a XP3200
12-16-2003, 11:55 PM
if only it was that black and white :D
01-16-2006, 11:00 PM
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
vBulletin v3.0.5, Copyright ©2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.