Rickmeister
03-17-2012, 03:03 PM
Hi guys,
I'm starting postproduction on a short film filmed on a RED ONE Mysterium X. As we have 60 VFX shots I've been testing using .r3d files straight into Nuke. Speed wise it is just as fast, sometimes even faster, as a OpenEXR sequence and it uses way less storage and thus way more manageable.
Now, my only problem is when I compare a r3d file with a OpenEXR sequence in Nuke there is a gamma difference between the two. When I add a Gamma node with value 0.5 (which should make it a Gamma curve of 2) there is still a slight difference with getting worse in the highlights and shadows.
Is anyone familiar with this problem, and how do you go about it?
I don't want the screw the colorist by rendering bad sequences.
I'm starting postproduction on a short film filmed on a RED ONE Mysterium X. As we have 60 VFX shots I've been testing using .r3d files straight into Nuke. Speed wise it is just as fast, sometimes even faster, as a OpenEXR sequence and it uses way less storage and thus way more manageable.
Now, my only problem is when I compare a r3d file with a OpenEXR sequence in Nuke there is a gamma difference between the two. When I add a Gamma node with value 0.5 (which should make it a Gamma curve of 2) there is still a slight difference with getting worse in the highlights and shadows.
Is anyone familiar with this problem, and how do you go about it?
I don't want the screw the colorist by rendering bad sequences.
